Supreme Court

SC Seeks Email On Ghaziabad ‘Dharam Sansad’ Plea

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Monday directed a group of former bureaucrats and social activists to email a request for urgent listing of their plea against a ‘Dharam Sansad’ in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh.

The event, organized by the Yati Narsinghanand Foundation, is scheduled to take place at the Shiv-Shakti temple complex in Dasna from Tuesday to Saturday.

The petitioners, represented by lawyer Prashant Bhushan, raised concerns over an alleged “open call for the genocide of Muslims” made in connection with the event. “I will consider. Please send an email,” Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna said during the hearing. Bhushan emphasized the urgency of the matter, as the ‘Dharam Sansad’ was set to commence the following day.

The plea also includes a contempt petition against the Ghaziabad district administration and Uttar Pradesh Police for allegedly disregarding the Supreme Court’s earlier orders. These directives had mandated authorities to take suo motu action against individuals or groups engaging in hate speech or communal activities.

The petitioners include prominent figures such as activist Aruna Roy, retired IAS officer Ashok Kumar Sharma, and former IFS officers Deb Mukarji and Navrekha Sharma. They accuse local authorities of “willful and deliberate contempt” of the court’s orders by permitting the event to proceed.

Concerns surrounding the ‘Dharam Sansad’ stem from a previous controversial gathering in Haridwar, Uttarakhand, where alleged hate speeches led to criminal proceedings against several individuals, including Yati Narsinghanand. The incident sparked widespread outrage and raised alarm over the rise of communal rhetoric at such events.

As the Ghaziabad event looms, the petitioners hope the Supreme Court will intervene to prevent further escalation of hate-driven activities. The case highlights growing concerns over the role of law enforcement and local administration in addressing hate speech and maintaining communal harmony.

(Inputs by Sambhav Sharma)

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

1 day ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

1 day ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

1 day ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

1 day ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

1 day ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

1 day ago