Supreme Court

SC Seeks Responses from All HCs on Discontinuation of Hybrid Hearing Modes

The Supreme Court on Friday sought responses from all high courts and certain tribunals regarding the discontinuation of hybrid modes for hearing cases, which allowed lawyers and litigants to participate via video conferencing.

A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra’s issued notices to the registrars general of all high courts and registrars of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), and National Green Tribunal (NGT), instructing them to file affidavits.

The bench stated, “An affidavit be filed by the registrars on whether video-conferencing or hybrid hearings are being continued or disbanded.”

Additionally, it asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to consult the finance ministry and other relevant ministries regarding the status of hybrid hearings at the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, debt recovery tribunals, and similar quasi-judicial bodies.

The Apex Court took note of petitioner Sarvesh Mathur’s submissions, who appeared in person, that the Punjab and Haryana High Court had ceased virtual hearings, causing inconvenience to litigants.

In response, the bench expressed gratitude for bringing this matter to their attention and stated, “We will do something for the cause, which we were thinking about for a long time. We will ask the high courts who have disbanded virtual hearings. You have brought to the notice of the court a very important issue. We are seeking a response from all the high courts and some tribunals to see what the status is.”

The court indicated that it would consider other issues related to expeditious hearings of the petitioner’s case pending before the Punjab and Haryana High Court at a later time. It stated, “We can issue directions for an expeditious hearing by the high court anytime, but if we pass the direction now, then we will have to dispose of the petition, and the other issue of virtual hearings will not get solved.”

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago