Supreme Court

SC Summons Maharashtra Additional Chief Secretary Over Contemptuous Affidavit

The Supreme Court summoned Rajesh Kumar, Maharashtra’s Additional Chief Secretary of the Revenue and Forest Department, to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him.

A Bench of Justices BR Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, and KV Viswanathan made this decision after finding some comments in Kumar’s affidavit to be potentially contemptuous. The Court directed Kumar to appear on September 9 to explain his actions.

The case involves the Maharashtra government’s failure to comply with a previous Supreme Court order regarding compensatory afforestation levies for denotifying forest land in Pashan, Pune.

On August 7, the Court criticized the Maharashtra government’s recent budget, which included various incentives totaling ₹96,000 crores, including the Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana, which offers ₹1,500 monthly to eligible women.

The Court warned on August 14 that it would stop such freebies if the state did not pay the required compensation by August 28. It also mentioned that if the compensation issue was not resolved, the Chief Secretary might be summoned and the budget incentives could be halted.

During today’s hearing, the Court was frustrated with Maharashtra’s lack of clear answers on compensation rates and accused the government of “dilly-dallying tactics.” Justice Gavai questioned, “When will you give the ready reckoner rates for Pashan?”

The Court also warned that it might immediately stop the Ladki Bahin Yojana due to the government’s lack of seriousness. It criticized the state’s affidavit and remarked, “It is the bounden duty of the State to follow the law and arrive at proper conclusions. A senior officer is not expected to make statements implying the court is unaware.”

Senior Advocate Dhruv Mehta, representing the landowners, was allowed to inspect the site to determine if monetary compensation was preferable. The Court directed the district’s collector to facilitate this inspection and adjourned the matter for two weeks.

Despite the state’s attempt to withdraw a statement from the affidavit, the Court remained firm and issued a contempt notice to Kumar.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Atul Subhash Case: Wife, Relatives File Anticipatory Bail Pleas In Allahabad HC

Engineer Atul Subhash’s estranged wife, Nikita Singhania, along with her family members, has filed anticipatory…

2 days ago

Koregaon Bhima Battle Anniversary Planning: BHC Allows Maharashtra Govt To Enter ‘Jay Stambh’ Plot

The Bombay High Court has recently granted the Maharashtra government permission to access the disputed…

2 days ago

Mahakumbh: NGT Extends Deadline For Sewage Management Plan

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has recently granted the Uttar Pradesh government additional time to…

2 days ago

US Appeals Court Turns Down TikTok’s Request To Delay Ban

A federal appeals court has recently rejected TikTok’s request to delay a law requiring the…

2 days ago

Delhi Court Sends Naresh Balyan To Judicial Custody, Denies Police Further Remand

A Delhi court on Friday sent AAP’s Uttam Nagar MLA Naresh Balyan to judicial custody…

2 days ago

Telugu Film Writer Defends Allu Arjun, Calls His Arrest ‘Fabricated’ Case

Actor Allu Arjun’s lawyer, Ashok Reddy, criticized the delay in his client’s release despite the…

2 days ago