Supreme Court

SC to Hear Marital Rape Pleas in Mid-October

The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will schedule hearings for pleas regarding marital rape in mid-October. These pleas raise the legal question of whether a husband can be immune from prosecution for rape if he forces his adult wife to have non-consensual sex.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra acknowledged the importance of these pleas, with lawyer Karuna Nundy emphasizing the need for their prompt consideration.

The bench mentioned that they are currently dealing with constitution bench hearings and will list the marital rape pleas for hearing after the constitution bench matters are concluded. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, estimated that he would need two days to present his arguments, highlighting the significant social implications of the issue. Counsel for the petitioners expressed their intent to argue for three days.

The Chief Justice humorously remarked that if they were to allocate such a lengthy period, the pleas might be listed for hearing in April next year. Ultimately, he decided to schedule the pleas for mid-October.

Previously, senior advocate Indira Jaising had sought an urgent hearing for the pleas. The petitions challenge the constitutional validity of an exception clause in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which currently exempts husbands from prosecution for marital rape involving their adult spouses.

The Apex Court emphasized the need to address the matters concerning marital rape, noting that these cases require a three-judge bench. The hearings will take place after the ongoing constitution bench hearings conclude.

On January 16, the Supreme Court had sought the Centre’s response to the petitions related to the criminalization of marital rape and the IPC provision in question. The government, represented by Solicitor General Mehta, acknowledged the legal and social implications of the issue and expressed its intention to file a response.

One of the pleas relates to a split verdict by the Delhi High Court on May 11, 2022, which prompted the petitioners to seek leave to appeal in the Supreme Court. The Karnataka High Court’s verdict, allowing the prosecution of a husband for allegedly raping his wife, is the subject of another plea. The Karnataka High Court had ruled that exempting husbands from allegations of marital rape violated Article 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago