SC To Pass Guidelines For Summoning Government Officials Across Country

The Supreme Court on Monday stated that it will lay down comprehensive guidelines to courts throughout the country for addressing the summoning of government and their officials.

The bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, emphasized the necessity for distinct procedures to deal with contempt proceedings arising from non-compliance with final judgments and interim orders in pending cases.

The bench stated that the submission of officials’ affidavits might serve, in instances of contempt arising from the failure to comply with court directives, the presence of the government officials may be necessary.

It stated, “We will lay down some guidelines for summoning of government officers. There must be a bifurcation of matters pending and the ones in which adjudication is complete. For pending (cases), summoning officers is not needed but once adjudication is complete then contempt steps in.”

The proceedings pertained to a case where the Allahabad High Court summoned two government officials for contempt of court.

Previously, on April 20, the Supreme Court ordered the immediate release of two secretaries from the Uttar Pradesh finance department. These officials had been taken into custody based on the orders of the Allahabad High Court in a contempt case.

The matter was mentioned for an urgent hearing then by Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, appearing for the UP government.

Nataraj pointed out that an “unprecedented order” had been issued by the high court, resulting in the detention of the finance secretary and special secretary (finance) in a contempt case involving provisions for retired high court judges.
Furthermore, the high court had issued bailable warrants to the state’s chief secretary in connection with the matter.

Previously, On April 4 the Allahabad High Court, ruled that the officers present in court, namely Shahid Manzar Abbas Rizvi, Secretary (Finance) of Uttar Pradesh, and Sarayu Prasad Mishra, Special Secretary (Finance), should be taken into custody and subsequently produced before the court to face charges.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago