Supreme Court

Shiv Sena Rift: SC Directs Maha Speaker to Set Timeline for Disqualification Pleas Against Shinde Faction

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Speaker of the Maharashtra assembly to provide a timeline within one week for the resolution of disqualification petitions against Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and Shiv Sena MLAs who aligned with the BJP to form a new government in June 2022.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra referred to the Supreme Court’s May 11 verdict on the Maharashtra political crisis, which had directed the speaker to decide on the disqualification petitions in a reasonable time. The bench emphasized the importance of the speaker adhering to the Supreme Court’s dignity and verdict.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the speaker, was asked to inform the court about the timeline set by the speaker for handling the disqualification petitions.

The bench emphasized the need for respect and adherence to the Supreme Court’s directions and scheduled the plea filed by the Shiv Sena (UBT) faction, seeking the disqualification of Eknath Shinde and other Shiv Sena MLAs supporting him, for a hearing in two weeks.

The bench noted that the speaker, as a tribunal under the tenth schedule of the Constitution, is subject to the court’s jurisdiction. It expressed concern that no action had been taken regarding the pending disqualification petitions since the May 11 judgment.

The Uddhav Thackeray faction had approached the Supreme Court in July, seeking a directive to the state assembly speaker to promptly adjudicate the disqualification petitions within a specific timeframe.

The petition, filed by Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) MLA Sunil Prabhu, who had submitted the disqualification petitions against Eknath Shinde and other MLAs in 2022 as the chief whip of the undivided Shiv Sena, alleged that Speaker Rahul Narwekar was intentionally delaying the adjudication despite the Supreme Court’s verdict.

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

9 hours ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

9 hours ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

10 hours ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

11 hours ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

11 hours ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

12 hours ago