Supreme Court

Skill Development Scam: No Relief to Chandrababu Naidu

The Supreme Court on Tuesday deferred till October 9 hearing of TDP (Telugu Desam Party) leader N. Chandrababu Naidu’s plea challenging an Andhra Pradesh High Court order that dismissed his petition to quash an FIR related to the Skill Development Corporation scam case.

A bench comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M. Trivedi asked Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Andhra Pradesh government to submit all materials presented before the high court in connection with the case. Rohatgi argued that Naidu’s request to quash the FIR should be rejected since the question of section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not apply. He noted that this provision was introduced in July 2018, while the CBI initiated the inquiry into the case in 2017.

Senior advocates Harish Salve, Abhishek Singhvi, and Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Naidu, contended that all the allegations in the FIR relate to decisions, instructions, or recommendations made by Naidu during his tenure as the chief minister of the state. They argued that this is essentially a political case, and the provisions of section 17A should apply.

Luthra pointed out that Naidu is facing multiple FIRs, suggesting a clear case of regime change. The bench decided to take up the matter again on the following Monday.

Naidu, aged 73, was arrested on September 9 on charges of misappropriating funds from the Skill Development Corporation during his tenure as chief minister in 2015, resulting in an alleged loss of Rs 371 crore to the state exchequer. His judicial remand has been extended until October 5.

According to the CID’s remand report, Naidu is accused of engaging in a criminal conspiracy, fraudulent misappropriation of government funds, disposal of property under the control of a public servant, cheating, forging documents, and destroying evidence.

Naidu approached the Supreme Court on September 23 to challenge the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to dismiss his petition seeking to quash the FIR related to the alleged scam.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

6 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

6 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

6 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

7 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

7 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

7 hours ago