Supreme Court

Skill Development Scam: No Relief to Chandrababu Naidu

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Tuesday deferred till October 9 hearing of TDP (Telugu Desam Party) leader N. Chandrababu Naidu’s plea challenging an Andhra Pradesh High Court order that dismissed his petition to quash an FIR related to the Skill Development Corporation scam case.

A bench comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M. Trivedi asked Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Andhra Pradesh government to submit all materials presented before the high court in connection with the case. Rohatgi argued that Naidu’s request to quash the FIR should be rejected since the question of section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not apply. He noted that this provision was introduced in July 2018, while the CBI initiated the inquiry into the case in 2017.

Senior advocates Harish Salve, Abhishek Singhvi, and Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Naidu, contended that all the allegations in the FIR relate to decisions, instructions, or recommendations made by Naidu during his tenure as the chief minister of the state. They argued that this is essentially a political case, and the provisions of section 17A should apply.

Luthra pointed out that Naidu is facing multiple FIRs, suggesting a clear case of regime change. The bench decided to take up the matter again on the following Monday.

Naidu, aged 73, was arrested on September 9 on charges of misappropriating funds from the Skill Development Corporation during his tenure as chief minister in 2015, resulting in an alleged loss of Rs 371 crore to the state exchequer. His judicial remand has been extended until October 5.

According to the CID’s remand report, Naidu is accused of engaging in a criminal conspiracy, fraudulent misappropriation of government funds, disposal of property under the control of a public servant, cheating, forging documents, and destroying evidence.

Naidu approached the Supreme Court on September 23 to challenge the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to dismiss his petition seeking to quash the FIR related to the alleged scam.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Delhi HC Notices Swiggy, Zepto To Reply To Plea For Making Apps More Accessible

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notices to Swiggy and Zepto in response to…

13 hours ago

Supreme Court Condemns Terrorist Attack In Pahalgam, Observes 2-Minute Silence

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday strongly condemned the terror attack on tourists in…

13 hours ago

Wealth Case: Madras HC Orders Framing Of Charges Against Minister Duraimurugan

The Madras High Court on Wednesday ordered a Special Court in Vellore to proceed with…

14 hours ago

26/11 Mumbai Attack Case: Delhi Court Reserves Order On Tahawwur Rana’s Plea

Delhi's Patiala House Court on Wednesday reserved its order on a plea filed by Tahawwur…

14 hours ago

Madras HC Dismisses Pleas By TASMAC Against ED’s Raid On Its Premises

The Madras High Court on Wednesday rejected petitions filed by the Tamil Nadu State Marketing…

15 hours ago

Supreme Court Refuses To Postpone BPSC Mains Exam Scheduled For April 25

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday declined to stay the Bihar Public Service Commission…

17 hours ago