Supreme Court

Supreme Court Affirms Taxation of Interest-Free Bank Loans

The Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment, affirmed that savings accrued from interest-free loans extended by employers are subject to taxation. This ruling solidifies the legitimacy of Section 17(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act and 3(7)(i) of the I-T Rules.

Facts of the Case

The All India Bank Officers’ Confederation, along with various staff unions and officers’ associations of several banks, had filed a batch of appeals before the honorable court and were challenging the validity of the provisions of the Income Tax Act and the I-T Rules, which levied tax on the money saved by bank employees through interest-free loans, which the banks advanced them.

Under the rule, if a bank employee obtains a zero-interest or concessional loan, the annual savings they accrue in comparison to the amount paid by an ordinary individual acquiring a loan of the same amount from the State Bank of India, subject to market interest rates, will be subject to income tax.

The petitioners contested the provisions on grounds of arbitrariness and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. They argued that using the prime lending rate of SBI as the benchmark instead of the actual interest rate charged by the bank to a customer on a loan was unfair and lacked precision.

Court’s Ruling

The court dismissed the petition and held that the benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate is a unique benefit and distinct advantage enjoyed by them. It is in the nature of a ‘perquisite’, and therefore it is liable to taxation. The bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta further observed that the establishment of SBI’s rate of interest as the benchmark is not arbitrary or discriminatory. However, the bench emphasized that the rule-making authority did not equate unequal entities but rather established a standard that applied uniformly to all. By employing SBI’s prime lending rate as the benchmark, the authority aimed to maintain fairness and consistency in taxation practices, ensuring that all individuals were subject to the same standard irrespective of their affiliations or circumstances.

Therefore, through this judgment, the court upheld the validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act and 3(7)(i) of the I-T Rules.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

3 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

3 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

4 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

5 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

5 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

5 hours ago