Supreme Court Appointed SIT Gives Clean Chit To Vantara

Vantara Wildlife

The Special Investigation Team appointed by the Supreme Court has cleared Vantara, the zoological rescue and rehabilitation centre in Jamnagar, Gujarat, of allegations concerning regulatory non-compliance and illegal animal acquisition.

The SIT’s report, which was taken on record by the apex court on Monday, concludes that the centre has complied with applicable laws and regulatory frameworks.

A bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and P.B. Varale reviewed the SIT’s report and observed that the authorities involved have expressed satisfaction regarding Vantara’s compliance measures. The court recorded the report’s contents and mentioned that it will issue a detailed order later in the day after thoroughly going through the SIT’s findings.

Background

The Supreme Court had constituted the four-member SIT on August 25 in response to allegations against Vantara concerning improper acquisition of animals, especially elephants, from both domestic and international sources. The investigation was prompted by two public interest litigations (PILs), which were based on media reports, social media posts, and complaints from NGOs and wildlife organisations alleging irregularities and lapses in animal welfare.

The SIT, headed by a former apex court judge, was tasked with conducting a fact-finding inquiry into the charges of law violations and ethical concerns surrounding animal handling and acquisition at the centre.

Previous Court Remarks

Earlier, on August 14, the Supreme Court had dismissed as “completely vague” a petition filed by C.R. Jaya Sukin. The plea had sought the creation of a monitoring committee to oversee the return of captive elephants housed at Vantara to their original owners. The court had noted that the petition lacked sufficient detail and clarity, undermining the credibility of its claims.

What’s Next?

The SIT’s clean chit is likely to provide Vantara with much-needed relief from the ongoing scrutiny. However, the Supreme Court’s pending detailed order will formalize the outcome and may outline future oversight mechanisms, if any are required.

The development is significant not only for Vantara but also for wildlife conservation efforts in the region, as it reflects the court’s measured approach in dealing with allegations based on preliminary media reports and unverified complaints.

The detailed order expected later today will clarify the court’s position and may set a precedent for handling similar allegations against animal rescue centres in the future.