Supreme Court

Supreme Court: Change in Law No Excuse for Delay Condonation

Supreme Court’s Observation

In a recent batch of land acquisition cases, the Supreme Court observed that a subsequent change in law cannot justify the condonation of delay in filing appeals. The bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Ujjal Bhuyan emphasized that accepting such grounds would open a Pandora’s Box, undermining the finality of judicial proceedings. They noted, “If subsequent change of law is allowed as a valid ground for condonation of delay, it would open a Pandora’s Box… There would be no finality to the proceedings.”

Case Background

The case involved the Delhi government’s land acquisition process under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the planned development of Delhi. From 1957 to 2006, various notifications were issued to acquire lands, with compensation amounts fixed. In some instances, compensation was deposited in the treasury due to the landowners not coming forward, while in others, possession could not be taken due to legal challenges by landowners. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was later replaced by the 2013 Act, which introduced reforms, including Section 24, deeming certain acquisition proceedings as lapsed.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court scrutinized the maintainability of petitions filed after the expiration of the limitation period, particularly considering the appellants’ argument of “subsequent change in law” due to later judgments. The court rejected this ground, stating, “The appellants let the limitation period lapse… When the law was subsequently re-interpreted… the appellants approached this Court… This does not square with our understanding of the law.” The court clarified that a subsequent change in law cannot be a “sufficient cause” under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and upheld the principle of finality in legal proceedings. However, the court allowed condonation of delay on other grounds, such as “public interest,” permitting most appeals accordingly.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago