Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies: CrPC Applicable to J&K Only Post Article 370 Abrogation

In the case of National Investigation Agency New Delhi v. Owais Amin @ Cherry & Ors., the Supreme Court clarified that the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) would be applicable to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) only from the date of the abrogation of Article 370 on October 31, 2019, and not before that.

This ruling came as the apex court addressed an appeal challenging a judgment from the Jammu & Kashmir High Court, which upheld a decision from the Special Judge, National Investigation Agency (NIA) Jammu, albeit partially. The bench, comprised of Justices M.M. Sundresh and S.V.N. Bhatti, deliberated on the matter.

Here is the full story:

  • Respondents faced charges under multiple sections of the RPC, Explosive Substances Act, UAPA, and Jammu & Kashmir Public Property Act for attempting to ambush a CRPF convoy with a car laden with explosives.
  • The case was initially registered by local police but re-registered by the NIA following an MHA order.
  • During proceedings, the Special Judge, NIA, found non-compliance with prescribed forms under CrPC, 1989, leading to the dismissal of certain charges.
  • However, the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir overturned the decision on two points but upheld the need for authorization under Section 196-A of CrPC, 1989.
  • The Supreme Court observed distinctions between Sections 196 and 196-A of CrPC, 1989 and clarified that the CrPC, 1973 would govern the field only from October 31, 2019, with the CrPC, 1989 standing repealed.
  • Any ongoing investigation as of the repeal of the former statute would continue under CrPC, 1989, but the application of law would be under CrPC, 1973, ensuring compliance with procedures.
  • The court held that non-compliance with earlier procedures under the repealed Code would not automatically benefit an accused, as it is a curable process depending on circumstances.
  • The requirement of authorization for conveying a complaint is mandatory, even if it occurs at the conclusion of an investigation, as it signifies completion of the investigation process.
  • The complaint was conveyed by the District Magistrate before the appointed day of the Act, 2019, indicating the application of CrPC, 1989 during the investigation’s completion.
  • Consequently, the Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the Special Judge.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

4 hours ago

Allahabad HC Turns Down Appeal Seeking Appointment Of Receiver For Jaigurudev Sanstha

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…

5 hours ago

Shivaji Statue Collapse Case: Bombay HC Grants Bail To Consultant Chetan Patil

The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…

5 hours ago

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Refuses To Stay Trial Against Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…

6 hours ago

AP Assembly Passes Resolution To Set Up HC Bench In Kurnool

The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…

6 hours ago

Lesbian Couple Desiring Child Gets Bail In Kidnapping Of Minor Girl

The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…

7 hours ago