Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail To 8 In 1987 Hashimpura Massacre Case

The Supreme Court on Friday granted bail to eight convicts in the infamous 1987 Hashimpura massacre case, where 38 people were killed by personnel of the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC).

The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih, considered the prolonged incarceration of the convicts after their acquittal by the trial court was overturned by the Delhi High Court.

Senior advocate Amit Anand Tiwari, representing four of the convicts—Sami Ullah, Niranjan Lal, Mahesh Prasad, and Jaipal Singh—argued that the appellants had been imprisoned for over 6 years following the high court’s verdict.

Tiwari contended that the trial court had acquitted the convicts based on a lack of evidence, and the high court’s reversal was based on erroneous grounds. He also noted the exemplary conduct of the appellants during the trial and appeal process.

After considering these arguments, the Supreme Court granted bail to the eight convicts pending the final outcome of their appeals.

Background of the Hashimpura Massacre

The Hashimpura massacre took place on May 22, 1987, in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, during communal tensions. PAC personnel, part of the 41st Battalion’s “C-Company,” allegedly rounded up around 50 Muslim men from Hashimpura and transported them under the pretext of safety due to ongoing riots. However, the victims were shot and their bodies dumped in a canal. 38 people were killed, and only five survived to recount the tragic event.

Trial and Appeals

The trial court acquitted 16 PAC personnel in 2015, citing insufficient evidence to prove their involvement. However, in 2018, the Delhi High Court overturned this decision, convicting the accused under Sections 302 (murder), 364 (kidnapping for murder), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), and Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment.

The eight convicts granted bail were among the 16 initially convicted by the High Court. Their appeals were pending before the Supreme Court. The chargesheet initially filed against 19 PAC personnel included names such as Surender Pal Singh, who was the platoon commander, but three of the accused died during the trial. Ultimately, 16 PAC personnel were convicted.

The case remains a significant chapter in India’s legal history, highlighting the struggle for justice in incidents involving state violence during communal conflicts.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Is Legal Education Keeping Up With The Times? | Legally Speaking

Legal education in India, once a static field, is now undergoing a significant transformation. The…

6 hours ago

Does India Need A Debate On The Constitution? Insights From Sudhanshu Trivedi | Legally Speaking

In a compelling session at the Third Law and Constitution Dialogue, Rajya Sabha Member Sudhanshu…

6 hours ago

‘AI Itself Is Not Inherently Bad’: Experts Discuss Deepfakes And AI Regulation | Legally Speaking

At the 3rd Law & Constitution Dialogue, a panel of experts from diverse fields addressed…

6 hours ago

‘Inclusion Of Muslim Women On Waqf Boards A Progressive Step’: Salman Khurshid Speaks On Constitutionality of The Waqf Act | Legally Speaking

At the Legally Speaking dialogue, Senior Advocate Salman Khurshid offered an insightful analysis of the…

6 hours ago

Justice Sanjay Kaul Opens Up On The Genocide Of Kashmiri Pandits | Legally Speaking Dialogue

At the 3rd Law & Constitution Dialogue hosted by NewsX, Justice Sanjay Kaul addressed the…

7 hours ago

‘Indian Women Are Vulnerable And They Need Women-Enabling Laws’: Experts Discuss Atul Subhash Suicide Case | Legally Speaking

At the Legally Speaking dialogue on “Prenup, Divorce & Inheritance,” legal experts deliberated on the…

7 hours ago