Supreme Court

Supreme Court Issues Notice To Centre Over Fresh Round III Of NEET-PG Counselling

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court has requested the central government’s response to a plea seeking the cancellation of the third round of All India Quota counselling for NEET-PG admissions.

The petition, filed by around 50 candidates, calls for the counselling process to be restarted.

Allegations of Unfair Advantage

The petitioners have raised concerns that during the initial rounds of counselling, certain candidates were granted unfair advantages, which resulted in other candidates losing out on seats that they could have otherwise secured.

According to the plea

“Commencing Round III of AIQ counselling before all states have concluded their Round II violates the Supreme Court’s order in the Ashish Ranjan case. The Respondents did not seek permission from the Court to deviate from the established counselling timeline and procedures.”

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Health Ministry

After considering the petition, a bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and K Vinod Chandran issued a notice to the Union Health Ministry’s Medical Counselling Committee (MCC), asking them to respond to the allegations raised in the plea.

Contentions Raised by Petitioners

The petitioners argue that candidates from certain states were allowed to participate in the AIQ Round III before completing their State Round II.

They contend that this situation created a disadvantage for other candidates, as the seats were effectively blocked by candidates from State Round II, preventing them from participating in Round III.

The petition also highlights the MCC’s responsibility to wait for all states to conclude Round II before proceeding with the AIQ counselling process.

The outcome of this petition could result in a revocation of Round 3 of the NEET-PG AIQ counselling, potentially leading to a fresh counselling process for candidates.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

1 day ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

1 day ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

1 day ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

1 day ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

1 day ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

1 day ago