Supreme Court

Supreme Court Registry Rejects Writ Challenging Collegium

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The collegium system is responsible for appointments and selections of judges in the court. Under this system, a committee, led by the Chief Justice of India and the other four judges of the Supreme Court, chooses and selects the judges of the Supreme Court. If appointments are made in the High Court, then the respective chief justice of that court, along with two other high court judges, make the appointment.

THE PLEADINGS

Recently, a writ petition filed by advocate Mathews Nedumpara sought through the Apex Court to abolish the collegium system. Through this petition, he also pleaded for the revival of the NJAC, i.e., the National Judicial Appointments Commission.

The National Judicial Appointments Commission was a proposal put forward by the government of India that was meant to substitute the collegium system, as the collegium system had been under a lot of flak as it lacked transparency. But it was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court way back in 2015.

Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara filed a petition seeking a declaration that the collegium system and favoritism have led to the denial of fair opportunities in the selection and appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts to practicing lawyers and numerous others who are equally, if not more, deserving but less privileged. The petition emphasizes the importance of ensuring equal opportunity for consideration for such appointments, lest their fundamental right to equal opportunity be infringed upon.

THE VERDICT

Addressing this petition, the Supreme Court Registry refused to end the collegium system and revive NJAC, as it held it to be a waste of judicial time and energy. The Supreme Court Registrar held that this particular legislation was already resolved earlier, and The Registrar strongly asserted that the current petition duplicates the issues that have already been resolved by the previous verdict.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International
Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

7 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

8 hours ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

9 hours ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

12 hours ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

15 hours ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

2 days ago