Supreme Court

Uttarakhand Forest Fires: Government Reports 0.1% Wildlife Cover Affected, Supreme Court Takes Notice

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court’s decision to hear a petition regarding the forest fire incident in Uttarakhand on May 6th reflects the gravity of the situation. The involvement of both the Indian Army and Indian Air Force in firefighting operations underscores the severity and urgency of the situation, prompting legal intervention to address the crisis effectively.

Government’s Response

The Uttarakhand government informed the Supreme Court about its efforts to contain the severe forest fires, stating that only a small fraction, 0.1 percent, of the state’s wildlife habitat has been affected by these incidents. The government reported to a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta that since November of the previous year, there have been 398 incidents of forest fires, all of which were caused by human activities.

The state counsel clarified that despite reports suggesting that 40 percent of Uttarakhand was engulfed in flames, the reality was far less dire, with only 0.1 percent of the state’s wildlife habitat affected by fires. Additionally, the lawyer presented an interim status report to the bench.

Additionally, the state government apprised the bench, consisting of Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, that it has taken swift action in response to the situation. Subsequently, 350 criminal cases have been filed regarding forest fires, with 62 individuals implicated in these cases.

Court’s Directions

The Supreme Court issued a directive instructing both the Uttarakhand government and the petitioners involved in the case to share their respective reports with the Central Empowered Committee (CEC). This decision is aimed at fostering a thorough assessment of the incident.

During the hearing, the bench stressed that strategies such as cloud seeding or relying solely on rain were not viable solutions to the issue, highlighting the necessity for proactive measures by the state. The proceedings was adjourned, with further hearings scheduled for May 15th.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

“Will Maintain Decency In Shows”: Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia In Undertaking To SC

Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia, popularly known as BeerBiceps, filed an undertaking in the Supreme Court on…

16 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Actress Ranya Rao Seeks Bail From Karnataka HC

Kannada actress Ranya Rao on Tuesday filed a bail petition in the Karnataka High Court…

17 hours ago

SC Declines To Entertain Mahua Moitra’s Plea Seeking Transparency In Financial Markets

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has directed Trinamool Congress (TMC) Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra…

17 hours ago

Ex-Ruler’s Heirs Move Delhi HC Over Rent For Bikaner House

The heirs of late Maharaja Dr. Karni Singh filed an appeal in the Delhi High…

17 hours ago

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Freeze On Federal Funding

The federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to freeze federal funding, delivering…

17 hours ago

Sexual Assault Case: Bombay HC Denies Bail To School Bus Driver

The Bombay High Court has denied bail to a school bus driver who was arrested…

19 hours ago