Vantara Wildlife Inquiry Case: SIT Submits Sealed Report To SC

Vantara Wildlife

The Special Investigation Team appointed by the Supreme Court to probe allegations of illegal animal acquisition at Vantara, a wildlife rescue and rehabilitation centre in Jamnagar, Gujarat, has submitted its findings in a sealed cover.

The report, which includes annexures and supplementary material saved on a pen drive, was officially recorded by a bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale, who noted, “It is accepted and directed to be taken on record.”

Background

The inquiry was initiated following concerns raised by CR Jaya Sukin, who alleged that Vantara had unlawfully obtained animals such as elephants, endangered birds, and other protected species under the pretext of offering rescue and rehabilitation services. The petitioner further claimed that animals were trafficked into the facility in violation of wildlife protection statutes, international transport laws, and animal welfare guidelines.

In response, the Supreme Court, on August 25, 2025, established the SIT under the leadership of former Supreme Court judge Justice Jasti Chelameswar. The SIT was tasked with determining whether Vantara’s operations complied with applicable laws and ethical practices.

Investigation Process

Over a 3-day visit to the Jamnagar facility, the SIT interviewed key members of Vantara’s leadership team and reviewed documents related to animal acquisitions and care practices. The investigation also included cooperation from forest department officials and enforcement personnel from several states.

Additionally, the SIT asked Vantara to summon its international collaborators to aid in further verification.

The team’s inquiry spanned several areas, including:

Legal compliance with wildlife protection laws
Adherence to global animal trade protocols
Implementation of proper animal care and husbandry standards
Environmental safeguards considering the centre’s location near industrial zones

Court’s Observations

The bench recognized the complexity of the case and emphasized that the investigation’s outcome must reflect both statutory obligations and ethical responsibilities. The court’s directions were clear that wildlife care must be rooted in compassion, transparency, and adherence to the law rather than profit or convenience.

Vantara affirmed its willingness to cooperate fully with the investigation. A representative of the organisation stated, “We acknowledge the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court with utmost regard. Vantara remains committed to transparency, compassion, and full compliance with the law.”

The official further expressed Vantara’s focus on its core mission, “Our mission and focus continue to be the rescue, rehabilitation and care of animals. We will extend full cooperation to the Special Investigation Team and continue our work sincerely, always placing the welfare of animals at the heart of all our efforts. We request that the process be allowed to take place without speculation and in the best interest of the animals we serve.”

The SIT’s report, submitted in adherence to the court’s timeline, will now be examined as part of the Supreme Court’s deliberations. The outcome will likely influence regulatory oversight and operational protocols for wildlife rehabilitation centres across the country.