Supreme Court

“Will Appoint Special Prosecutor To Conduct Trial In 2015 Cash-For-Vote Scam Case”: SC

The Supreme Court announced on Thursday that it will appoint a special prosecutor to oversee the trial in the 2015 cash-for-vote scandal, involving Telangana Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy as one of the accused.

The decision came during a hearing on a petition that requested the trial be moved from Telangana to Bhopal.

A bench consisting of Justices B. R. Gavai, P. K. Mishra, and K. V. Viswanathan stated that they would consult with colleagues from Telangana and issue an order by 2 pm. The petitioners, including Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLA Guntakandla Jagadish Reddy, argued that the trial should be transferred due to public statements made by the Telangana Chief Minister about the case.

Senior advocate C. Aryama Sundaram, representing the petitioners, emphasized that Revanth Reddy, who is also the state’s Home Minister, could influence the trial. He cited the principle of natural justice, arguing, “There is a rule of natural justice that no person should be a judge in his own cause.”

In response, the bench indicated that they would appoint an independent public prosecutor to ensure an unbiased trial. The case dates back to May 31, 2015, when Revanth Reddy, then with the Telugu Desam Party, was caught by the Anti-Corruption Bureau while allegedly attempting to bribe nominated MLA Elvis Stephenson with ₹50 lakh in exchange for support in the legislative council elections. Others involved in the case were also arrested but later released on bail.

The petition for transferring the trial to Bhopal argues that a fair trial is essential under Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to an impartial and unbiased criminal trial. It claims that Revanth Reddy’s current positions as Chief Minister and Home Minister give him the power to influence witnesses and officers, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the trial.

Additionally, the plea has called for the transfer of another related case from a Telangana court to Bhopal. On January 5, the Supreme Court postponed the hearing of a separate petition by Revanth Reddy challenging a high court ruling that upheld the ACB court’s jurisdiction in the case.

In July 2015, the ACB filed a chargesheet against Revanth Reddy and others under the Prevention of Corruption Act and for criminal conspiracy. The charges were supported by audio and video recordings, as well as the recovery of the ₹50 lakh advance payment.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

7 mins ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

42 mins ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

1 hour ago

“Not All Private Properties Can Be Acquired Under Article 39(b)”: SC

A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling on Tuesday regarding the…

1 hour ago

Karnataka HC Notices CM On Plea To Transfer MUDA Case To CBI

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and…

3 hours ago

Delhi HC Dismisses PIL For Councillors’ Fund Increase, Advises Raising Of Issue In MCD House

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation filed by MCD Councillor…

3 hours ago