![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/20451a38_1294_P_1_mr-1.jpg)
When judges/courts start a suo motu proceeding of contempt, they act as the prosecutor, the witness, and the judge, which makes it equivocal and solely at the discretion of the judges themselves... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/897768d1_1241_P_1_mr-1.jpg)
The court has very rightly expressed its grave concerns pertaining to the inordinate delay in the disposal of the appeals. What is most pleasing to see is that the two-judge bench of... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/b015e153_1212_P_3_mr-1.jpg)
The court has set aside the three-year moratorium imposed by the Bar Council of India on opening of new colleges as ultra vires of the Indian Constitution. Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Kerala-High-Court-1.jpg)
In a latest, landmark, learned and laudable judgment titled District Collector Alappuzha v. District Legal Service Authority, Alappuzha and others in WP (C) No. 7250 of 2014 (E) delivered just recently on... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Delhi-HC.jpg)
Delhi High Court has made it abundantly clear that there cannot be any legality or validity attached to a fatwa issued by a maulvi especially in respect of ownership of immovable property.... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Bombay-HC-1.jpg)
It is really great, good and genuine that the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court in Arun and Shailendra vs The State of Maharashtra and 4 others in Criminal Writ Petition No.... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Section-295AThe-‘Blasphemy’-Provision.jpg)
It was contended on behalf of the petitioner that in order for Section 295A to pass muster on the anvils of Article 19(2), the only limb of the Article that could be... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/6fdd326b_1047_P_3_mr-1.jpg)
The Delhi High Court has set the record straight on the ambit of the Internal Complaints Committee. Justice Pratibha M. Singh has clearly laid down that ICC should refrain from indulging in... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Panel-Supreme-court.jpg)
In a well-written, well-worded, well-reasoned, well-substantiated and well-analysed judgment titled Iqbal Basith and others vs N Subbalakshmi and others in Civil Appeal No. 1725 of 2020 delivered as recently as on December... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Right-to-be-forgotten-1.jpg)
The article examines the conception and subsequent development of the right to be forgotten in
the European Union. Marked by an extensive right to privacy jurisprudence, the sustainability
of the right is higher in... Read more »