In a landmark ruling, a Kolkata court operating under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act imposed the death penalty on a 34-year-old man convicted of the rape of a seven-month-old infant, a crime that resulted in severe medical trauma to the victim.
In addition to capital punishment, the court mandated a financial compensation of ₹10 lakh for the child’s family, recognizing the grave nature of the offense and its long-term consequences.
The incident, which occurred in November 2024 in North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, was subject to an intensive investigation led by the Burtolla police. Law enforcement authorities expeditiously filed a chargesheet against the accused, Rajib Ghosh, identifying him as the sole perpetrator.
The prosecution, represented by the state counsel, sought the severest possible punishment, contending that the crime fell within the legal framework of the “rarest of rare” doctrine, thereby justifying the imposition of the death penalty.
During the judicial proceedings, Sessions Judge Indrila Mukhopadhyay underscored the exceptional brutality of the crime, asserting that its severity left no alternative but capital punishment. In her judgment, she remarked, “This is a rarest of rare case…cannot think of any other punishment.” The conviction was rendered under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, a provision addressing aggravated penetrative sexual assault, underscoring the judiciary’s recognition of the egregious nature of the crime.
A critical aspect of this case is the expedited adjudication, with the verdict being delivered within three months of the crime.
This rapid judicial resolution reflects an evolving jurisprudence in India that prioritizes swift legal action in cases of sexual violence against minors. The sentencing sets a significant precedent in the adjudication of child sexual offenses, reinforcing the judiciary’s unwavering stance against such crimes.
The ruling has stimulated discourse among legal scholars, human rights advocates, and child welfare organizations. While many argue that stringent punitive measures serve as a deterrent, others contend that the effectiveness of the death penalty remains debatable. This case has reignited discussions on the balance between retributive justice and rehabilitative approaches in dealing with crimes of such magnitude.
Beyond the legal ramifications, this case highlights the need for comprehensive policy interventions to prevent sexual violence against children.
Legal experts and child rights activists emphasize that punitive measures, though necessary, must be complemented by systemic reforms, including heightened surveillance, community awareness initiatives, and psychological rehabilitation programs for both victims and offenders.
While this verdict underscores the judiciary’s commitment to delivering justice in cases of extreme sexual violence, it also raises broader questions about the effectiveness of the capital punishment framework.
As debates continue, this ruling stands as a testament to the evolving legal landscape in India, where courts are increasingly prioritizing the expeditious delivery of justice in crimes involving the most vulnerable members of society.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International
